Business Continuity And Disaster Recovery World Tue, 17 May 2022 10:48:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Business Continuity And Disaster Recovery World 32 32 Biofertilizers Market Research Report by Microorganism Type, Technology, Crop Type, Application, Region – Global Forecast to 2027 Tue, 17 May 2022 10:48:00 +0000


Biofertilizers Market Research Report by Microorganism Type (Azospirillum, Azotobacter, and Blue-Green Algae), Technology, Crop Type, Application, Region (Americas, Asia Pacific & Europe, Middle East & Africa) – Global Forecast to 2027 – Cumulative Impact of COVID-19

New York, May 17, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — announces the release of the report “Biofertilizers Market Research Report by Microorganism Type, Technology, Crop Type, Application, Region – Global Forecast to 2027 – Cumulative Impact of COVID- 19” –

The global Biofertilizers Market size was estimated at USD 3,491.19 Million in 2021 and is projected to reach USD 3,842.76 Million in 2022, and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 10.32% to reach USD 6,295.31 Million by 2027.

Market statistics:
The report provides market size analysis and forecasts for five major currencies: USD, EUR, JPY, GBP, AUD, CAD, and CHF. It helps organizational leaders make better decisions when currency data is readily available. In this report, the years 2019 and 2020 are considered as historical years, 2021 as the base year, 2022 as the estimated year and the years from 2023 to 2027 as the forecast period.

Segmentation and market coverage:
This research report categorizes Biofertilizers to forecast revenues and analyze trends in each of the following submarkets:

On the basis of microorganism type, the market has been studied on Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Blue-Green Algae, Mycorrhiza, Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria and Rhizobium.

On the basis of technology, the market has been studied across Carrier Enriched Biofertilizers and Liquid Biofertilizers.

On the basis of crop type, the market has been studied on Fruits & Vegetables, Cereals & Grains, Plantation Crops, and Pulses & Oilseeds.

Based on application, the market has been studied in seed treatment and soil treatment.

Based on region, the market has been studied in Americas, Asia-Pacific, Europe, Middle East & Africa. The Americas are studied in more detail through Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico and the United States. The United States is studied in more detail through California, Florida, Illinois, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Texas. Asia-Pacific is studied in more detail through Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and Thailand. Europe, the Middle East and Africa are studied in more detail in France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, the United Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom.

Cumulative impact of COVID-19:
COVID-19 is an unparalleled global public health emergency that has affected almost every industry, and the long-term effects are expected to impact industry growth over the forecast period. Our ongoing research amplifies our research framework to ensure inclusion of the underlying issues of COVID-19 and potential pathways forward. The report provides insights into COVID-19 considering shifts in consumer behavior and demand, shopping patterns, supply chain rerouting, current market force dynamics, and significant interventions governments. The updated study provides insights, analysis, estimates, and forecasts considering the impact of COVID-19 on the market.

Cumulative impact of the 2022 Russian-Ukrainian conflict:
We continuously monitor and update reports on political and economic uncertainty due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Negative impacts are widely predicted globally, particularly in Eastern Europe, the European Union, East and Central Asia, and the United States. This controversy has severely affected lives and livelihoods and represents profound disruptions to business dynamics. The potential effects of the ongoing war and uncertainty in Eastern Europe are expected to negatively impact the global economy, with particularly harsh long-term effects on Russia. This report reveals the demand and supply impact, pricing variants, strategic vendor adoption, and recommendations for the Biofertilizers market considering the current conflict update and its global response .

Competitive Strategy Window:
The strategic competitive window analyzes the competitive landscape in terms of markets, applications and geographies to help the vendor define an alignment or match between its capabilities and opportunities for future growth prospects. It describes the optimal or favorable fit for vendors to adopt successive strategies of merger and acquisition, geographic expansion, research and development, and new product introduction strategies to execute further business expansion and growth. during a forecast period.

FPNV positioning matrix:
The FPNV Positioning Matrix evaluates and ranks vendors in the Biofertilizers Market based on Business Strategy (Business Growth, Industry Coverage, Financial Viability, and Channel Support) and Product Satisfaction (Quality Ratio -price, ease of use, product features, and customer support) that helps businesses make better decisions and understand the competitive landscape.

Market share analysis:
The market share analysis offers the analysis of the vendors considering their contribution to the overall market. It gives the idea of ​​its revenue generation in the overall market compared to other providers in the space. It provides information on the performance of vendors in terms of revenue generation and customer base compared to others. Knowing the market share gives an idea of ​​the size and competitiveness of suppliers for the reference year. It reveals the characteristics of the market in terms of accumulation, fragmentation, dominance and merger.

Competitive scenario:
The competitive scenario provides an analysis of the prospects of the various business growth strategies adopted by the vendors. The news covered in this section provides valuable insights at various stages while keeping abreast of business news and engaging stakeholders in the economic debate. The competitive scenario represents press releases or company news categorized into merger and acquisition, agreement, collaboration and partnership, new product launch and improvement, investment and funding, and awards, recognition and expansion. All the news collected helps the vendor to understand the gaps in the market and the strength and weakness of the competitors, thus providing insights to improve the product and service.

Enterprise Usability Profiles:
The report thoroughly explores recent significant developments by leading vendors and innovation profiles in the global biofertilizers market including Agri Life, Agrinos AS, BASF SE, Bayer AG, Biomax Naturals, Borealis AG, Camson Biotechnologies Limited, Certis USA LLC , Criyagen Agri & Biotech Pvt Ltd, ICL Group Ltd., Kiwa Bio-Tech Products Group Corporation, Lallemand Inc., Mapleton Agri Biotech Pty Limited, MC FERTICOM Co., Ltd., Mitsui & Co. Ltd, National Fertilizer Ltd, Novozymes A/S, Origin Enterprises plc, Rizobacter Argentina SA and Symborg SL.

The report provides information about the following pointers:
1. Market Penetration: Provides comprehensive information about the market offered by major players
2. Market Development: Provides detailed information on lucrative emerging markets and analyzes penetration in mature market segments
3. Market Diversification: Provides detailed information on new product launches, untapped geographies, recent developments and investments
4. Competitive Assessment and Intelligence: Provides a comprehensive assessment of market shares, strategies, products, certification, regulatory approvals, patent landscape, and manufacturing capabilities of key players
5. Product Development and Innovation: Provides smart insights into future technologies, R&D activities, and breakthrough product developments

The report answers questions such as:
1. What is the market size and forecast of the global biofertilizers market?
2. What are the inhibiting factors and impact of COVID-19 on the global biofertilizers market during the forecast period?
3. What are the products/segments/applications/areas to invest in during the forecast period in the global Biofertilizers market?
4. What is the competitive strategic window for opportunities in the Global Biofertilizers Market?
5. What are the technological trends and regulatory frameworks in the global biofertilizers market?
6. What is the market share of the major vendors in the global biofertilizers market?
7. What modes and strategic moves are considered suitable for entering the global biofertilizers market?
Read the full report:

About Reportlinker
ReportLinker is an award-winning market research solution. Reportlinker finds and organizes the latest industry data so you get all the market research you need – instantly, in one place.


CONTACT: Clare: US: (339)-368-6001 Intl: +1 339-368-6001
FDA Announces It Will Make It Easier To Import Certain Formulas To Ease Shortage Tue, 17 May 2022 02:07:20 +0000 The United States produces 98% of the formula it normally uses, and imported formula comes mainly from Mexico, Ireland and the Netherlands, the company said in a statement. But due to the shortage, the FDA “does not oppose the importation of certain baby products intended for the foreign market” and outlines the U.S. supply of domestically-made products for export to other countries. . Countries.

“Companies wishing to take advantage of this flexibility must submit information to the FDA to quickly assess whether the product is safe to use and provides adequate nutrition,” the company said. “For example, information on labeling, nutrient and safety adequacy testing, and facility inspection history.”

Management will have “a good chance of success and will prioritize applications that represent clear quality and safety and adequate nutrition,” a White House official said. He told CNN he has security surveillance systems similar to those in the United States, including those imported from Ireland, Chile, Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States. -Low.

The FDA said it is already in talks with some manufacturers and suppliers about additional supply, but officials warn that even importing the formula from overseas won’t bring immediate relief.

“With this flexibility, we expect products that can quickly meet safety and nutrition standards to hit U.S. stores within weeks,” FDA Commissioner Dr. Robert Khalif said in a statement. communicated.

Susan Mane, director of the FDA’s Center for Food Safety and Consumption Nutrition, said at a press conference Monday, “It depends on what kind of information we get from others, but we review it weekly. Put the imported product on the market.

The news comes as the White House works with major manufacturers Help provide logistical support During childhood Lack of formula An official said in a statement Monday.

“The White House is in constant dialogue with four manufacturers of formula for older children, Reckitt, Abbott, Nestlé/Gerber and Ferrico, working with them to identify barriers to traffic, logistics and suppliers to increase production of formula. in the United States – and FDA-approved facilities To expand the size and speed of FDA-approved formulas shipped in the country and provide faster transitions from formula factories to retailers,” a House official said. White.

CNN released the news earlier on Monday The Biden administration is facing a barrage of questions and criticism over the national formula shortage, which has left anxious and angry parents rushing from store to store in search of baby food. Admin launched a new website, provide resources to families in need, but when a CNN reporter tested some of these options, the exercise apologized to customer service representatives. Top recommendations listed on the New Health and Human Services website.
White House The manager said he was “in constant contact” with Target, Amazon, Walmart and other major retailers, adding that “certain areas of the country have been identified and the formula for children is very weak and offered to working with manufacturers”. We have to find an additional formula. “
President Joe Biden holds virtual meetings with Target and Walmart executives on Thursday As formula makers Reckitt and Gerber, respectively. According to officials, officials are “in close contact to follow up on these conversations.”

Efforts are also being made to increase the supply chain by accessing formula manufacturers’ suppliers.

“We are liaising with suppliers of infant formula manufacturers to let them know that their products are important to increasing production of formula for American children, and that they should prioritize production and distribution,” the manager said.

Khalif, who attended CNN’s “New Day” event on Monday, said management is “doing everything we can” to address the shortage.


The company said Monday it would take six to eight weeks for products to hit store shelves after the Abbott site relaunched.

Highlighting the effectiveness of the measure to facilitate the importation of certain formulas, the caliph said that in “a few weeks” the situation would “gradually improve” to a much greater extent.

This Thursday, Khalif testified before the Agricultural Appropriations Subcommittee overseeing the FDA’s 2023 Budget Request and Child Formula.

The infant formula shortage has been exacerbated by the closure of Abbott Nutrition’s Sturkis, Michigan plant, the nation’s largest infant formula plant.

Production at the facility was halted in February after four children who ingested the factory-made formula were reportedly infected with a rare and serious infection caused by the bacteria Chronobacter Sakasaki. Two children died there. Even a whistleblower Detailed claims to the FDA Abbott was hiding safety concerns months before the formula withdrawal in February.

However, in the end, tests conducted by the FDA and the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention revealed that the genetic sequences of the plant’s chronobacter samples did not match those isolated from infected children or the formula. from their home. Abbott said in a press release that the genetic samples from the sick children did not match and there was no correlation between their cases.

Additionally, Abbott said no infant formula distributed to consumers has tested positive for Chronobacter or Salmonella.

Insisting on how quickly supply will return to normal, HHS Secretary Xavier Beserra declined to comment on what CNN said on Monday as “the one who can tell you the timeline.”

Beserra said he was working with the federal government to ensure the security issues raised by them were resolved and that “this should be done in a few weeks.”

“We don’t operate their factories. Only they can address the security issues identified by our research. They have been doing this for some time. We advised them on what they should do,” Beserra told CNN’s Kate Bold. “This time.”

“We will do everything we can to pull all possible levers to help it move as quickly as possible, but they control their factory. They own and operate it. They are the ones who have to make the adjustments.”

Abbott said last week it could resume production at its Michigan plant with FDA approval within two weeks, but it could take a few more weeks before the formula hits shelves.

On CNN, Becerra echoed management’s response to Abbott’s recall and complaint, saying “we’re moving as fast as we can.”

“If you’re going to do something drastic like induce a manufacturer to pull a product off the shelf, the FDA is moving forward at a planned pace to make sure there’s good evidence for that. That’s why it’s going to take time. “, did he declare. .

This story has been updated with additional reports.

CNN’s Brenda Goodman, DJ Judd, MJ Lee and Jacqueline Howard contributed to the report.

Double insurance: the second insurer can refuse a claim when the loss has been fully compensated by another insurer Mon, 16 May 2022 05:58:24 +0000 The Supreme Court recently ruled that in cases of overlapping insurance policies, where the insured’s defined loss is fully indemnified by one insurer, the second insurer is not liable for the claim for the same loss.

“An insurance contract is and always remains a contract for indemnification of the defined damage, no more and no less. In the case of specific risks, such as those resulting from a loss due to fire, etc., the insured cannot profit and take advantage by double insurance.”

A bench comprising Judges UU Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat and PS Narasimha allowed the appeal against the order of the National Consumer Dispute Redress Commission (NCDRC), which ordered the insurance company to pay Rs. 1.78 crores towards the claim raised by the insured. While finding that the insurance company was not liable to pay, the Apex Court noted that in this case the issue was one of “double insurance” “overlapping policy”, in which the entity requests coverage of the same or similar incident risks from two insurance policies.

Factual background

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (insurer) has issued a Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy (SFSP Policy) to Levis Strauss (India) Pvt. ltd. (insured) covering its stock in stock, first for a period from 01.01.2007 to 31.12.2007 then from 01.01.2008 to 31.12.2008. Levis Strauss & Co., the insurer’s parent company, has obtained a global policy (STP Policy) from Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty (Allianz) for the period from 01.05.2008 to 30.04.2009. It covered the inventories of all its subsidiaries, including the insurer. Another “all risks” policy (AR Policy) was issued by Allianz for the period from 01.05.2008 to 01.05.2009 covering the actions of its subsidiaries throughout the world.

On 13.07.2008, a fire broke out in one of the warehouses containing the insured’s stocks. On 18.07.2008, the insured claimed Rs. 12.20 crores from the insurer. Subsequently, on 11.09.2009, the insurer rejected the claim stating that condition No. 4 of the SFSP policy excludes liability for losses payable under the marine policy, i.e. the STP font. The insured approached the NCDRC, which upheld his complaint, without deciding whether the STP policy was a marine policy. Reading Section 47 of the STP policy, he noted that said policy excludes the scope covered by the national policy. It held that if the loss of profit that the insured would have made on the sale of the damaged stock was borne by Allianz, the loss suffered up to the cost of the goods would be borne by the insurer. He allowed the claim to the extent of Rs. 1.78 crores as the insured had received 19.52 crores from Allianz.

Grounds raised by the appellant

The lawyer, Mr. AK De, appearing on behalf of the insurer, argued that the foreign policy, i.e. the STP policy, covered the risk of fire of the stock during transport, as well as in store and elsewhere. He attacked the NCDRC’s interpretation of SFSP Policy Condition #4 and STP Policy Clause 47 to argue that loss to property was covered by the SFSP policy while the STP policy covered the lack to win. It was claimed that the loss suffered being composite, it could not be divided. Mr. De pointed out that the demand was for Rs. 12.4 crores, against which he received Rs. 19.52 from Allianz. Therefore, he argued that the insured had received more money than the admitted loss.

Arguments raised by the respondent

The lead solicitor, Mr Joy Basu, appearing on behalf of the insured, argued that under section 2(c)(b) of the Insurance Act 1938 and section 25 of nationalization law, there is an obligation to take out insurance through a national insurer. . It was pointed out that the insured had a contractual obligation to have its risk covered by a national policy and that under clause 47 of the STP policy, the main obligation rested with the national insurer. He argued that coverage under both policies was mutually exclusive – the SFSP policy expressly excluded non-manufacturing losses arising from fire; which was covered by the STP policy. Otherwise, it would indicate that the insurer was collecting premiums without any liability.

Supreme Court analysis

The STP policy is a shipping policy

Section 4 of the Marine Insurance Act 1963 posits that a marine insurance contract may, by its express terms or by usage of the trade, be extended so as to protect the insured against losses on inland waters or against any land risk which may be incidental to any maritime voyage. Referring to a series of judgments, the Court noted that marine insurance policies in India include warehouse risks, combined with voyage and other maritime risks. The STP policy also states that it covers both maritime and other risks. In addition, the policy describes itself as an “open marine insurance contract”. She observed that the policy includes maritime risks and therefore constitutes maritime cover.

Pursuant to condition 4 of the SFSP policy, the insurer was not required to pay

The Court noted that Condition No. 4 of the SFSP policy provided that on the occurrence of an insurance risk, if the insured was entitled to a claim under a marine policy, the insurer would not could be held responsible. Relying on Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. vs. Garg Sons International (2014) 1 SCC 686; Vikram Greentech India Ltd v New India Assurance Co. (2009) 5 SCC 599; Sikka Papers Ltd c. National Insurance Co (2009) 7 SCC 777; Impact Funding Solutions Ltd. vs. Barrington Support Services Ltd. (2016) UKKSC 57, the Court was of the view that the party wishing to limit its liability must do so in clear terms and that the insured cannot claim more than what is covered by the insurance policy. On a strict interpretation of Condition 4, the Court held that the insurer had excluded its liability for the risk covered by a marine policy, which in this case was the STP policy. The Court also noted that there was no legal or contractual obligation for the insurer to obtain a national police in the conduct of its business and therefore the NCDRC had wrongly applied clause 47.

Double insurance

The insured had raised a claim of Rs. 12.2 crores with the insurer. Against the claim of Rs. 12.2 crores, he had already received around Rs. 19 crores from Allianz. Considering the same, the Court observed that a contract of insurance is a contract of indemnity for definite loss. In the event of specific risks, the insured cannot benefit from double insurance. In this regard, Castetion v. Prestton (1833) 11 QBD 380 was mentioned, which held that in the event of loss the insured would be fully indemnified, but never more than fully indemnified. The Court held –

“Levi could not have claimed more than he did, and in no way more than he received from Allianz. His effort to distinguish between the STP police and the SFSP police, it that is, the former covered the loss of profits, and the latter, the value of the manufactured goods, is not borne out by an interpretation of the terms of the two policies Even the facts here clearly show that Levi received amounts substantial to the selling price of its damaged products, in addition to manufacturing costs.”

Business name: United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Levis Strauss (India) Pvt. ltd.

Reference: 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 487

Case No. and Date: Civil Appeal No. 2955 of 2022 | May 2, 2022

Coram: judges UU Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat and PS Narasimha


Marine Policy – Section 4 of the Marine Insurance Act, 1963 – A contract of marine insurance may by its express terms, or by usage of trade, be extended so as to protect the insured against loss on inland waters or on any land risk which may be incidental to any voyage at sea – warehouse risks, combined with voyage and other maritime risks, are considered part of marine insurance policies in India (paragraph 19 ).

Insurance Law – Exclusion of Liability in Insurance Policies – as a general rule it is well settled that if a party, otherwise liable, wishes to exclude or limit its liability to the other party, it must do so in clear terms; and that the contract should have the meaning that it would give to a reasonable person having all the basic knowledge reasonably available to the person or class of persons to whom the document is addressed (paragraph 19).

Insurance law – Double insurance – where an entity seeks to cover risks for the same or similar incidents through two different – overlapping policies – two or more insurers must have insured the same insured against of the same risk on the same interest in the same subject matter – once the first insurer has paid full indemnity to the insured, the second insurer would be entitled to decline liability – in the case of specific risks, such as those resulting from loss due to fire, etc., the insured cannot and do benefit from double insurance (paragraphs 46 and 47).

Click here to read/download the judgment

Weekend Bridge Payday Loans: A Direct Lender Alternative Mon, 16 May 2022 03:42:58 +0000 What Are Weekend Payday Loans?

The weekend payday loans are short-term non-secured loans that are intended to address a short-term shortage of funds. It’s better not to even think about one unless you’re certain you’ll be able to repay it in time.

The weekend payday loans work like traditional payday loans, with a couple of exceptions:

  • Instant loan approval. The weekend payday loans are approved even quicker than a typical payday loan. They are also able to be approved 24 hours a day by an online payday lender.
  • They are characterized by brief-term loans. Borrowers must make the full repayment within 2 to 4 weeks, in the majority of instances.

Unexpected events can sabotage the whole budget. A lot of people are stressed and don’t have the time to just wait to get a traditional loan. This is why many choose to make use of payday loans.

In contrast to other kinds of secured loans that are traditional, payday loans online are particularly accessible to those who need them. Furthermore, weekend payday loans are just as affordable as any other loan for those who have bad credit. But the benefits they provide in terms of speed and convenience may not be enough to offset the risks.

Risks of Weekend Payday Loans

Whatever type that payday loan you’re thinking about it’s likely to come with a significant price. Payday loans, generally are known to have high rates of interest and bad terms for loans. The high rates and the shorter repayment times could make it difficult to repay on time or even in any way. This can lead to a phenomenon known as “rollover.”

Rollover occurs when the lender is willing to the option of extending the loan time. While this might sound like a good idea but they can also add costs and charges to the new loan. This makes the new loan more difficult to pay off as compared to the first. This is the reason why most cash-loan customers get into an endless series of loans.

The possibility of rollover, high-interest rates, and short repayment times short repayment periods make payday loans a very risky financial decision.

How Do Weekend Payday Loans Work?

A borrower who is on a payday loan will undergo the same procedures as a borrower. Once deciding on a lender, the borrower fills in an online form and provides the relevant information.

Once you have completed an application for a loan, the decision about the loan is usually taken immediately. The lender will then send documents detailing the total cost of the loan and repayment terms. It is essential to read the terms and conditions carefully. After the borrower electronically signs the documents and they will be notified that the loan amount is sent via direct deposit. From loan application to loan disbursement, the entire process may be completed in just a day!

Loan Qualifications

While the requirements may differ between lenders, however, most loans have you satisfy the following requirements:

  • You must be at minimum 18 years old
  • Provide a form of government-issued ID
  • You must have at least an active bank account (either checking or savings)
  • You must have a valid telephone # and email

Weekend Loans With Bad Credit?

The majority of people are aware they bad credit is a significant aspect in determining the types of loans offered to the potential borrower. Credit scores are a measure of credit score is a measure of the creditworthiness of an individual. It’s tool lenders and creditors employ to determine whether or not they will grant an individual a loan. Based on a thorough review of the history of a person’s payments and their overall use of available credit lines credit credit score can be described as a number with three digits which ranges from 300 to 850. A credit score lower than 600 is considered to be a bad credit score.

Excellent credit ratings show a good track record of managing your payments. This implies that those who have good credit have access to loans with higher interest rates. However, bad credit signals a greater risk for a lender. Thus, a borrower who has bad credit is a riskier customer and therefore is subject to a higher interest rate.

In contrast to loans at the bank, payday loans don’t require an evaluation of credit scores or other financial details. Since they were designed for those who might not be able to finance their needs, payday loans are made accessible to those who are able to repay them regardless of credit background.

Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers ETF (NASDAQ:PEY) Short yield up 95.4% in April Sun, 15 May 2022 20:54:43 +0000

Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers ETF (NASDAQ:PEY – Get Rating) benefited from a sharp increase in short-term interest rates in April. As of April 30, there was short interest totaling 160,600 shares, an increase of 95.4% from the total of 82,200 shares as of April 15. Based on an average daily volume of 369,600 shares, the short interest ratio is currently 0.4 days.

Several hedge funds and other institutional investors have recently changed their stock holdings. Renaissance Technologies LLC acquired a new equity position in the Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers ETF in the first quarter worth $330,000. Worth Asset Management LLC bought a new stake in Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers ETF in the first quarter worth $460,000. Equitable Holdings Inc. increased its position in the Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers ETF by 1.4% in the first quarter. Equitable Holdings Inc. now owns 72,940 shares of the company valued at $1,592,000 after acquiring an additional 1,006 shares during the period. Oxford Financial Group Ltd. acquired a new stake in Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers ETF in the first quarter, valued at $1,088,000. Finally, NewEdge Advisors LLC increased its position in Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers ETF by 28.2% in the first quarter. NewEdge Advisors LLC now owns 71,259 shares of the company valued at $1,556,000 after acquiring an additional 15,661 shares during the period.

NASDAQ: PEY traded down $0.21 during Friday trading hours, hitting $21.37. 523,655 shares of the company were traded, against an average volume of 361,767. The company has a 50-day moving average of $21.63 and a 200-day moving average of $21.19. Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers ETF has a 1-year low of $19.27 and a 1-year high of $22.67.

The company also recently announced a monthly dividend, which was paid on Friday, April 29. Investors of record on Tuesday, April 19 received a dividend of $0.071. The ex-dividend date was Monday, April 18. This represents a dividend of $0.85 on an annualized basis and a dividend yield of 3.99%.

Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers ETF Company Profile (Get a rating)

The PowerShares High Yield Equity Dividend Achiever Portfolio (the Fund) is based on the Mergent Dividend Achiever 50 Index (the Index). The Fund aims to invest at least 90% of its total assets in dividend-paying common stocks, which make up the Index. The index is made up of 50 stocks selected primarily on the basis of dividend yield and consistent dividend growth.

Read more

Get daily news and reviews for Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers ETF – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analyst notes for the Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers ETF and related companies with’s FREE daily newsletter .

Liquid Bath Soap Market Size, Outlook, Strategies, Manufacturers, Type and Application, Global Forecast to 2029 – Instant Interview Sun, 15 May 2022 10:19:14 +0000

New Jersey, United States – The Liquid Bath Soap market report understands the upcoming challenges and opportunities in the market. It ensures a strengthened market position and a growing product portfolio by providing all the important details related to the market growth. It reveals some of the key insights and focuses on the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on different sectors of the economy. Identifying key business areas is the single most important factor in improving those areas and generating greater profits. This living market research provides an in-depth understanding of how new product offerings can fit into the market. It acts as the best guide and plays the leading role in almost all phases of the business cycle. It also becomes easy to effectively target customers to easily launch new products. This Liquid Bath Soap market reports another key focus is to provide manufacturing solutions at all provincial and global levels.

A comprehensive overview of market conditions and various business-related elements is covered in this Liquid Bath Soap market research report. It enables business actors to reach target groups and provides all important details about customers and competitors. Quantitative research methods are used to conduct this market research to provide accurate market data and problem solving. Liquid Bath Soap market report helps to identify major regions such as Asia-Pacific, North America, Europe, Middle East, Africa, and Latin America where new players and merchants can expand their business. Moreover, it performs in-depth analysis and provides market size, market dynamics, and market share.

Get Sample Full PDF Copy of Report: (Including Full TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Chart) @

Also, the market share of each industry over the forecast period is discussed. This market report also provides insights on industry dynamics, market share, growth prospects and challenges. It also conducts market research to determine the growth models, approaches, and techniques used by key players. The most important statistics in the industry trends report provide the ideal reference for businesses. Apart from company profile, capacity, production rate, product value and specifications, the report covers other important parameters.

Key Players Mentioned in the Liquid Bath Soap Market Research Report:

Colgate-Palmolive Company, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., PZ Cussons, Unilever PLC, Crabtree & Evelyn, AVON PRODUCTS, Unilever, Pears, Nivea, Adidas.

Liquid Bath Soap Market Segmentation:

Liquid Bath Soap Market, By Nature

• Biological
• Natural
• Conventional
• Others

Liquid Bath Soap Market, By Application

• Hand washing
• Body wash
• Dishwashing

Liquid Bath Soap Market, By End Users

• Household
• Commercial

Get a discount on the purchase of this report @

Scope of the Liquid Bath Soap Market Report

UNITY Value (million USD/billion)
SECTORS COVERED Types, applications, end users, and more.
REPORT COVER Revenue Forecast, Business Ranking, Competitive Landscape, Growth Factors and Trends
BY REGION North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa
CUSTOMIZATION SCOPE Free report customization (equivalent to up to 4 analyst business days) with purchase. Added or changed country, region and segment scope.

Answers to key questions in the report:

1. Who are the top five players in the Liquid Bath Soap market?

2. How will the liquid bath soap market develop over the next five years?

3. Which product and application will occupy the lion’s share of the liquid bath soap market?

4. What are the drivers and restraints of the Liquid Bath Soap Market?

5. Which regional market will show the strongest growth?

6. What will be the CAGR and size of the Liquid Bath Soap market throughout the forecast period?

For more information or query or customization before buying, visit @

Visualize the Liquid Bath Soap Market using Verified Market Intelligence:-

Verified Market Intelligence is our BI platform for market narrative storytelling. VMI offers in-depth forecast trends and accurate insights on over 20,000 emerging and niche markets, helping you make critical revenue-impacting decisions for a bright future.

VMI provides a global overview and competitive landscape with respect to region, country and segment, as well as key players in your market. Present your market report and results with an integrated presentation function that saves you more than 70% of your time and resources for presentations to investors, sales and marketing, R&D and product development. products. VMI enables data delivery in Excel and interactive PDF formats with over 15+ key market indicators for your market.

Visualize the Liquid Bath Soap Market using VMI@

About Us: Verified Market Research®

Verified Market Research® is a leading global research and advisory firm that for over 10 years has provided advanced analytical research solutions, personalized advice and in-depth data analysis to individuals and businesses seeking accurate research, reliable and up to date. data and technical advice. We provide insight into strategic and growth analytics, the data needed to achieve business goals, and help make critical revenue decisions.

Our research studies help our clients make superior data-driven decisions, understand market forecasts, capitalize on future opportunities, and maximize efficiency by working as a partner to deliver accurate and valuable insights. The industries we cover span a wide spectrum, including technology, chemicals, manufacturing, energy, food and beverage, automotive, robotics, packaging, construction, mining and the gas. Etc.

At Verified Market Research, we help in understanding holistic market indicator factors and most current and future market trends. Our analysts, with their deep expertise in data collection and governance, use industry techniques to gather and review data at all stages. They are trained to combine modern data collection techniques, superior research methodology, subject matter expertise and years of collective experience to produce informative and accurate research.

Having served over 5000 clients, we have provided reliable market research services to over 100 Global Fortune 500 companies such as Amazon, Dell, IBM, Shell, Exxon Mobil, General Electric, Siemens, Microsoft, Sony and Hitachi. We have co-consulted with some of the world’s leading consulting firms such as McKinsey & Company, Boston Consulting Group, Bain and Company for custom research and consulting projects for companies around the world.

Contact us:

Mr. Edwyne Fernandes

Verified Market Research®

USA: +1 (650)-781-4080
UK: +44 (753)-715-0008
APAC: +61 (488)-85-9400
US Toll Free: +1 (800)-782-1768



America’s Neglect of Nuclear Power Has Weakened Our Global Influence Sat, 14 May 2022 15:00:00 +0000

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s brutal war against the Ukrainian people has been a wake-up call for America’s European allies, exposing critical national security vulnerabilities as countries like Germany have balked at providing support military to Ukraine and to impose strong economic sanctions on Russia because of the threat. that Putin would cut oil and gas exports.

But he also laid bare the consequences of America’s long neglect of its domestic nuclear energy sector. Major federal investments in solar, wind, and natural gas technologies over the past few decades have allowed the United States to cut off Russian fossil fuel imports with little impact on our economy. But over the same period, we have largely ceded American leadership in nuclear energy to Russia and China.

Failure to invest in nuclear infrastructure and a sclerotic nuclear regulatory system have led to premature plant closures, problems building new reactors, increased regulatory burdens and operating costs, and an atrophied domestic supply chain for uranium and nuclear fuels. Russia now supplies 20% of the enriched uranium that powers our reactors, and Russia’s TENEX is currently the world’s only commercial supplier of high-dosage low-enriched uranium (HALEU) on which many of America’s next-generation reactors will run. . Russia also currently operates the only facility capable of testing the materials and components that can keep the United States at the forefront of commercial nuclear power technology.

America’s short-sighted neglect of its nuclear energy sector has also weakened our nation’s power and global influence against the authoritarian regime of Russia. Russia is today the world’s largest exporter of nuclear technology, offering an attractive package of technology, financing, nuclear fuel and waste disposal to nations seeking clean and reliable nuclear power as protection against overreliance on imported fossil fuels and intermittent renewables. Globally, Russia produces about 40% of total enriched uranium production for civilian nuclear power.

Many of our democratic allies, from Eastern Europe to Africa to Latin America, would prefer to use American nuclear technology and do not want the strings that are tied to nuclear commercialism and armed energy diplomacy. of the Kremlin. American nuclear engineering remains the best in the world. American companies have developed a range of highly innovative nuclear technologies and business models that can meet the enormous global demand for clean and reliable energy, help our allies avoid dependence on Russian energy technologies and fuels and Chinese and develop US technology and energy export markets.

Eastern European countries, in particular, have long sought to import US nuclear technology over objections from countries like Germany and Belgium, warning European leaders that the geopolitical and security risks of importing of energy from Russia were far greater than the risks associated with nuclear energy. These concerns have proven to be prophetic.

In the absence of an American option, the alternative in the decades to come will probably be Chinese reactors. China has made huge investments in nuclear technology over the past decade and is poised to start exporting these technologies soon. But it brings dependency on America’s strongest competitor and a long-term national security challenge under Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s rule and therefore poses an even greater threat to geopolitical and economic interests. the United States.

Reversing America’s decline as a leader in nuclear energy will require urgent action from the Biden administration and the US Congress. There is strong bipartisan support for reinvigorating American nuclear energy, as evidenced by the International Nuclear Energy Act of 2022 introduced by Sens. Joe Manchin (DW. Va.) and Jim Risch (R-Idaho). Their bill would expand the ability of the United States to process and enrich uranium for our own national needs and for our allies, as well as invest in new capabilities to produce the more enriched uranium that will power the next generation of American reactors. It would also accelerate the export of critical nuclear technology to our allies and help bolster their nuclear energy programs.

But there is still work to be done to ensure that America and its allies break our dependence on Russian nuclear technology. Above all, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission must reform and modernize its nuclear licensing procedures. Today’s advanced nuclear technologies are smaller, simpler and safer than those of the past. Most have inherent and passive safety features that allow them to operate safely without the multiple layers of redundant safety systems that are now required to operate conventional reactors.

There is no reason it should take a decade and a billion dollars to license a new nuclear reactor, as has remained the case for the past few years. Congress must also fully fund the Multipurpose Test Reactor, which is needed to ensure that the United States will be able to test and bring innovative new nuclear technologies to market.

Perhaps in the years following the Cold War, the national security interests of the United States could resist importing our Middle Eastern oil, our solar panels and our critical minerals from China and of our uranium from Russia. But that era is over. The time has come for President Biden and Congress to take the necessary steps to ensure that America and its Democratic allies have access to advanced nuclear energy technology made in the United States and to guarantee that an energy safe, clean and reliable is available worldwide to power open energy and democratic societies.

Ted Nordhaus is founder and executive director of the Breakthrough Institute.

Valerie Shen is vice president of Third Way’s national security program.

India bans wheat exports with immediate effect – News Sat, 14 May 2022 05:16:15 +0000

Food security is at risk, according to the country

Reuters file

By Reuters

Published: Sat 14 May 2022, 09:16

Last update: Sat 14 May 2022, 11:02

India banned wheat exports on Saturday, just days after saying it was aiming for record shipments this year, as a scorching heat wave slashed output and domestic prices hit a record high.

The government said it would still allow exports backed by letters of credit already issued and to countries that request supplies “to meet their food security needs”.

Global buyers were banking on supplies from the world’s second-largest wheat producer after exports from the Black Sea region plummeted following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in late February. Before the ban, India was aiming to ship a record 10 million tonnes this year.

The ban could push global prices to new highs and hurt poor consumers in Asia and Africa.

“The ban is shocking,” said a Mumbai-based dealer with a global trading company. “We were expecting export restrictions after two to three months, but it seems the inflation figures have changed the government’s mind.”

Rising food and energy prices pushed India’s annual retail price inflation to an eight-year high in April, bolstering economists’ view that the central bank should raise interest rates. interest more aggressively to rein in prices.

Wheat prices in India hit a record high, in some spot markets up to 25,000 rupees ($322.71) a tonne, against a minimum support price set by the government at 20,150 rupees.


Earlier this week, India outlined its record export target for the 2022/23 financial year which started on April 1, adding that it would send trade delegations to countries such as Morocco, Tunisia, India and India. Indonesia and the Philippines to explore ways to further increase shipments.

But a sharp and sudden rise in temperatures in mid-March means the crop size could be smaller than expected at around 100 million tonnes or even less, said a New Delhi-based dealer with a global trading company. The government had estimated that production would reach a record level of 111.32 million tonnes.


“Government purchases have fallen by more than 50%. Spot markets are receiving much lower supplies than last year. All of these things point to a lower harvest,” the dealership said.

Benefiting from a rise in world wheat prices following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, India exported a record 7 million tonnes of wheat in the fiscal year ended March, up more than 250% over the previous year.

“Wheat price rise has been rather subdued and Indian prices are still significantly lower than world prices,” said Rajesh Paharia Jain, a New Delhi-based trader.

“In fact, wheat prices in some parts of the country reached their current level even last year, so the decision to ban exports is nothing more than a knee-jerk reaction,” he said. he added.

In April, India exported a record 1.4 million tonnes of wheat and agreements have already been signed to export around 1.5 million tonnes in May.

“The Indian ban will drive up global wheat prices. Currently, there is no big supplier in the market,” said another dealer.

Lonking Holdings (HKG:3339) cuts its dividend to HK$0.22 Fri, 13 May 2022 23:31:03 +0000

Lonking Holdings Limited (HKG:3339) announced that it would reduce its dividend payable on July 29 to HK$0.22. Yield is still above the industry average at 10%.

Check out our latest analysis for Lonking Holdings

Lonking Holdings does not earn enough to cover its payments

If the payouts aren’t sustainable, a high return for a few years won’t matter much. Based on the latest dividend, Lonking Holdings earns enough to cover the payment, but it represents 2,066% of cash flow. While the company may be more focused on returning cash to shareholders than growing the business at this time, we believe that such a high cash payout ratio could expose the dividend to a reduction if the company was having difficulties.

Looking ahead, earnings per share are expected to fall 12.9% over the next year. If the dividend continues on recent trends, we estimate the payout ratio could reach 111%, which could put the dividend at risk if company earnings do not improve.

SEHK: 3339 Historic dividend May 13, 2022

Dividend volatility

The company’s dividend history has been marked by instability, with at least 1 cut in the past 10 years. The first annual payment in the past 10 years was CN¥0.12 in 2012, and the most recent year’s payment was CN¥0.18. This means that it increased its distributions by 4.1% per year during this period. It’s encouraging to see some dividend growth, but the dividend has been cut at least once, and the magnitude of the cut would eliminate most of the growth anyway, making it less attractive as a income investment.

The dividend should increase

Since the dividend has been reduced in the past, we need to check if earnings are increasing and if this could lead to higher dividends in the future. We are encouraged to see that Lonking Holdings has increased its earnings per share by 23% per year over the past five years. The company has no problem growing, despite returning much of the capital to shareholders, which is a very nice combination for a dividend-paying stock.

In summary

Overall, the dividend seems to have been a bit high, which is why it has now been reduced. While Lonking Holdings earns enough to cover payments, cash flow is lacking. We would probably look elsewhere for an income investment.

Investors generally tend to favor companies with a consistent and stable dividend policy as opposed to those with an irregular one. Meanwhile, despite the importance of dividend payouts, these are not the only factors our readers should be aware of when evaluating a company. Example: we have identified 4 warning signs for Lonking Holdings (1 of which should not be ignored!) that you should know. If you are a dividend investor, you can also consult our curated list of high yielding dividend stocks.

This Simply Wall St article is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell stocks and does not take into account your objectives or financial situation. Our goal is to bring you targeted long-term analysis based on fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not take into account the latest announcements from price-sensitive companies or qualitative materials. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

Tetra Laval, SIG Combibloc – SMU Daily Mustang Fri, 13 May 2022 18:22:59 +0000

The research titled Best Global Liquid Cartons Market by Player, Region, Type, Application and Sales Channel, Forecast 2022-2030 provides a holistic assessment of the Top Liquid Carton industry. It provides readers with a comprehensive analysis of the competitive landscape, key segments, challenges, drivers and latest trends playing a crucial role in the market. The competitive landscape of this market provides details by competitor. Various details included are research and development investment, company profiles, global presence, company finances, production capabilities, market potential, company strengths, locations of production and new market initiatives. It also sheds light on application dominance, product breadth, business weaknesses, and new product launches.

Major competitors include:
  • Tetra Laval
  • SIG Combibloc
  • Greatview aseptic packaging
  • evergreen packaging
  • Japanese paper
  • Mondi PLC
  • Refresco Group
  • IPI
  • American Cardboard Company
  • ONEX Corporation
  • Reynolds Holdings Group
  • BillerudKorsn√§s
  • Kappa Smurf
  • Liqui Box
  • Ferd
  • Adam’s Pack
  • TidePak aseptic packaging
  • Ital Pack Boxes
  • Likang packaging
  • Stora Enso
  • Weyerhaeuser
  • Xinju Feng Bundle
  • Bihai machinery
  • Sonderen packaging
  • Visy Industries
  • Parkson Packaging

Get a sample report (including full TOC, charts and tables) of this report

We have segmented the global Top Liquid Cardboard market into application, region, product type, end-user, and method. The geographic assessment section of the market research report provides individual impacting factors and transformation of norms that nationwide affect future and current market trends. Several data points, such as value chain analysis, import-export analysis, entry strategies, and key trends are used to estimate market scenarios for each country. The availability and presence of various global brands and the challenges they face due to rare or heavy competition from domestic and international players are examined in the report. It also highlights the impact of domestic tariffs and trade routes.

Top liquid carton markets by product type:
  • ‚â§200ml
  • 201-500ml
  • 501-1000ml
  • ‚â•1000ml
Top Liquid Board Markets by Types of Application:
  • Dairy products
  • Liquid foods
  • Juices & Drinks
  • Others
Top liquid carton markets by sales channel:
  • direct channel
  • Distribution channel
Market segment by region/country comprising:
  • North America (United States, Canada and Mexico)
  • Europe (Germany, UK, France, Italy, Russia and Spain etc.)
  • Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Australia and Southeast Asia, etc.)
  • South America (Brazil, Argentina and Colombia etc.)
  • Middle East and Africa (South Africa, UAE and Saudi Arabia etc.)
Data sources and methodologies

Our research report involves the comprehensive use of primary and secondary research methodologies. The process includes the study of several factors impacting the market to detect strategies of key players, market dynamics, competitive landscape, companies and types of segmentation. The secondary research process involves the use of databases such as D&B Hoovers, Factiva, Businessweek, and Bloomberg. It also includes directories, secondary sources, company SEC filings, investor presentations, internal company documents, annual reports and white papers. We have gathered useful information for a commercial, market-oriented, technical and in-depth study of the market. Major sources on the demand side include staff from research institutes, doctors, sales and purchasing managers, and industry experts.

Read in detail the scope of the report on:

  1. Major Liquid Cartons Market Overview (Market Definition, Market Size Status, Market Size Comparison by Region, Type, Applications and Sales Channel, COVID-19 Impact Analysis)
  2. Market Segment Analysis by Player (Sales and Market Share by Player, Revenue and Market Share by Player, Average Price by Player, Player Competition Status and Trends)
  3. Market Segment Analysis by Type (Sales and Market Share by Type, Revenue and Market Share by Type, Average Price by Type, Leading Liquid Cardboard Players by Type in 2021)
  4. Market Segment Analysis by Application (Revenue and Market Share by Application, Top Consumers of Top Liquid Cartons by Application in 2021)
  5. Market Segment Analysis by Sales Channel (Revenue and Market Share by Sales Channel, Leading Distributors/Resellers of Best Liquid Cartons by Sales Channel in 2021)
  6. Major Liquid Cartons Market Segment Analysis by Region (Market Size and CAGR by Region, Sales and Market Share by Region, Revenue and Market Share by Region, and Detailed Analysis by Region)
  7. Profile of Key Players (Business Performance (Company Overview, Product/Service Offered, Business Performance (Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share))
  8. Analysis upstream and downstream of Top Liquid Carton (industrial chain of Top Liquid Carton, upstream and downstream of Top Liquid Carton)
  9. Top Liquid Cardboard Development Trend (2022-2030) (Market Size and CAGR Forecast by Type, Region and Sales and Revenue Forecast 2022-2030)
  10. Appendix (Research Methodology, Data Sources, Analyst Certification)

Please browse the detailed table of contents at:

Key insights by Top Liquid Carton Study
  • Market development: Provides detailed information on lucrative emerging markets and analyzes penetration in mature market segments
  • Market penetration: Provides complete information about the market offered by major players
  • Market Diversification: Provides detailed information on new product launches, untapped geographies, recent developments and investments
  • Product development and innovation: Provides intelligent insights into future technologies, R&D activities and breakthrough product developments
  • Evaluation and competitive intelligence: Provides a comprehensive assessment of key players’ market shares, strategies, products, certification, regulatory approvals, patent landscape, and manufacturing capabilities
Report customization:

This report can be customized to meet customer requirements. Please contact our sales team (, who will ensure that you get a report tailored to your needs. You can also get in touch with our executives at +1 (210) 807 3402 to share your research needs.